Two related stories on the theme of collection development .
One is the plight of the research library with a big acquisitions budget but that's running out of room to store all of its word-hoard from over the years. The solution: for every 10 new books in the collection, get rid of 6 old ones. The predictable result: research faculty in opposition. From the Columbus (Ohio) Dispatch:
Holding signs that read "Bricker Hall burns books" and "Don't Gut the Library," the group asked
the library director to find more shelf and storage space for the school's growing collection.
The protesters said Ohio State has discarded 275,000 books and other printed materials from 2005
to 2008 and an additional 55,000 in the past four months.
"The 55,000 books are more than what the University of Minnesota system got rid of in all of
last year, and the (total) is three times as many books as the University of Michigan has discarded
over the same time," said Kevin Boyle, a history professor.
Note the fondness for old materials and for the experience of going through the stacks instead of fetching single works from closed stacks via a catalog or a digital search, and the particular plight of users of rare materials in non-Western languages who are served poorly or not at all by digitization.
The second problem shows what the opposite of getting rid of too many books brings you - library collections that have books in them that are so out of date or so worn out as to be inappropriate for any kind of current circulating library. As noted by Eli Neiburger at Tech Uncamp, the blog Awful Library Books catalogs the worst of the worst that need to be removed from the shelves to make room for better ones
I Can Learn About Calculators and Computers
Kenyon
1961
This lovely gem from the early 1960’s is still sitting in this library’s youth section. No one felt that it was necessary to weed in the advent of portable calculators from the late 1970’s or the advent of personal computers in the late 80’s and 90’s. I can only imagine that perhaps this community the children are stuck in a time warp and waiting for the arrival of radical new technologies like carbon paper, rotary phones and fire. By the way one of the nice little touches of this book is the flyer glued inside detailing the late return fee of 2 cents per day.
Tattered, worn out copies of popular materials are easily as bad for these collections as stale, dusty anachronisms always on the shelves, and it takes different management techniques to snag and replace or remove each.
What's funny (or amusing or sad or interesting or puzzling) is that the same work can be completely inappropriate for a circulating library collection and very reasonable to keep for a research collection; if you were doing work on the history of technology, that 1961 gem is an artifact, not something to be used for current instruction.
Recent Comments