If you're writing regularly, you'll find yourself writing things that aren't earth-shattering. These posts won't be passed around virally from one person to another, and they might not even get your regular readers to look at them very closely. Yet you persist, in part because you've set yourself some goals, and in part because you're trying to be consistent in getting something publishable out there just so that there isn't a blank space in the stream.
Popularity is not the only measure of a weblog. You can be writing for a very narrow audience, that one person who you want to make an impression on this time, and if no one else reads what you have to say that's all OK.
I'm thinking of some of the writing I've done for my FOIA Coordinator weblog, which has a fraction of the readership of my old FOIA Friday column at AnnArbor.com. My goal for that blog is to produce something every single Friday, even if it's short, so that there's something to say when the weekly #FOIAchat session happens on Twitter. Some of the most fascinating news I run into is bitter battles about hair-splittingly small differences between what how expects their government to be run and how it's actually run. The accumulation of small details is the goal, so that there's a rich set of examples to search back through when it's time to make a point.
Recent Comments