« You are invited to join the Vacuum mailing list | Main | Coming up with the right tone for blog and wiki postings »

November 30, 2004

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4f1a53ef00d83468b84a69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Network KVM shopping:

Comments

Thanks Pete.

The Adderlink from Addertec *is* managable remotely through VNC. There's a review at http://www.techworld.com/networking/reviews/index.cfm?productID=196&reviewid=191 . The review doesn't note whether the VNC sessions can be run under SSH.

The Adderlink can use VNC4's 128 bit AES encryption and 2048 bit RSA public/private key authentication:

http://www.realvnc.com/products/KVM-via-IP/

It can also support up to 4 remote clients simultaneously, a nifty feature.

A stockist in the UK has one of the units up for live demo:

http://www.kvmswitchdirect.co.uk/acatalog/kvm-over-ip.htm

You'll need to use a Personal edition (available soon) or Enterprise edition viewer to try the encryption. The Enterprise edition viewers are free -- RealVNC only charge per VNC server.

Before you spend a cent, check out Free/Open Software solutions:

Synergy:
Poor Man's Unix KVM:

I use both of these in my home office setup... I have 3 side-by-side monitors and 5 or 6 machines (depending on how you count). (SuSE, FreeBSD, Win2K, and OS X). Synergy is particularly useful because as I scroll my mouse from one monitor (say, the Windows box) to the very edge, the mouse magically scrolls onto the next monitor, which may be running a different OS (on a completely different box). Configuration is a snap, as well.

Once you get past 2 machines, the cost of a hardware solution dramatically increases. (Even a 2-port KVM can be pretty expensive).

I used to have a physical KVM, and I'll never go back.

Whoops. Here are the links:

Synergy: http://synergy2.sourceforge.net/
Poor Man's Unix KVM: http://www.syrlug.org/contrib/unix_kvm.html

There are, of course lots of different solutions, but the biggest reason to go with a hardware solution is for stability. If a service hangs, then there is no access. Running VNC or any other software solution will not give you access to the BIOS either. In addition, every software that is installed slows the computer down.

For the $50 or so, I would always go with a hardware solution (http://www.daxten.us/overview.cfm?prodID=56)

Of course for larger server rooms, hardware solutions are the only real solution especially where true remote access is required. Here are some links of remote access KVM products:

http://www.daxten.us/overview.cfm?prodID=37
http://www.daxten.us/overview.cfm?prodID=49
http://www.daxten.us/products.cfm?product_type_id=19

I've also recently started a blog to try and update people on KVM technology.
http://kvm-switch.typepad.com/kvmswitch/

Just one man's opinion.

I just wrote up my experiences with various vendors.


http://www.everythingsysadmin.com/archives/000061.html

Looking at two VNC servers for Win98 (to take control of an ancient Dell that still has some data on it). What came up with an easy search was RealVNC and TightVNC. I'll share any notes if I get results.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

About Edward Vielmetti

My Photo

Categories

mybloglog


Subscribe to Vacuum

  • Subscribe with Bloglines

    See also my other blog, Superpatron, for library patrons and libraries.

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2003